Data Masking with JPA and Spring Security

The protection of sensitive data is an increasingly popular topic in IT applications

Advertisements

The protection of sensitive data is an increasingly popular topic in IT applications. Also in our case, a customer asked us, on an already existing web application, to implement a data masking solution that is dynamic and based on security profiles.

The application is developed in Java, with Spring MVC for the management of the Model View Controller, JPA for data access and Spring Security for the management of security profiles.

There are two approaches in literature: SDM (Static Data Masking) and DDM (Dynamic Data Masking).

SDM

SDM plans to clone the current database by masking sensitive data. Specific inquiry applications that provide data masking can read from the cloned database.

Advantages:

  • performance of data access at runtime

Disadvantages:

  • data read can be not updated (update takes place via batch and, depending on the mode, the update can last from minutes to hours)
  • not ideal for a role-based / field-based security scenario

DDM

DDM plans to mask data when it is read at runtime.

Advantages:

  • real data reading,
  • ideal for a role-based / field-based security scenario

Disadvantages:

  • read / write overhead performance
  • possible unmusk algorithms to avoid data corruption (to prevent the masked data from persisting on the DB)

Given the customer’s requests, the DDM technique is the one that best suits a dynamic scenario based on security profiles.

At this point another choice had to be made because for DDM there are two approaches:

JPA Rewriting

In the literature we talk about SQL Rewriting, in our specific case JPA rewriting, JPA being our data access layer. The data is masked in a PostLoad or PostUpdate annotated method of a JPA Entity Listener, that means in the persistent layer.

Advantages:

  • punctual masking of the data in the load phase from the DB
  • easy data-masking mapping

Disadvantages:

  • masking depending on the data type (for example a string can be masked with ‘***’, or with ‘###’, a number with ‘000’ or ‘999’, a date with ’99 / 99 / 9999 ‘, etc etc …)
  • difficulty in the Look & Feel for rendering the view if the data is masked (each view should declare the masking … re-enter in the case of View rewriting below)
  • unmask algorithms that use the user session to store unmasked data. JPA makes shering of objects loaded by DB, so it is not said that an object loaded by an inquiry function is not then used for an update function. In this case the masked data would be persisted on DB, that means data corruption
  • complex make the masking dependent on the function (use of the user session for function-masking mapping)
  • complex use of the user session (see above for unmask and function-masking mapping)

View Rewriting

The data is masked in the presentation layer, typically in jsp pages.

Advantages:

  • homogeneous masking (does not depend on the type of data, everything can be masked for example with ‘***’)
  • it is not required unmusk phase
  • easy rendering for a look & feel (each view declares whether or not it wants masking)
  • easy to make it dependent function (each function declare whether or not it wants masking)

Disadvantages:

  • not punctual masking (all the views must mask … the tags reused by the view simplify, but not completely)
  • difficult data-masking mapping (each view must declare the data)

We chose to adopt the View Rewriting, because analyzing the effort (which in this article omits because not relevant), it was, more or less, similar between the two approaches, while the risk of data corruption and out of memory exceptions of user session are absent. Moreover the View Rewriting solution is much more customizable for what concerns the Look & Feel

To implement the solution we need the following things in detail:

  • a generic editor to enable or not a field for masking
  • a masking class that performs data masking based on security profiles
  • to modify all existing views to use the masking class above

Let’s see in detail

Role-based security mapping

We use a role-based security mapping based on Spring Security (already present in the application). For any data that you want to mask, a role is created made like this:

ROLE_MASK_DOMAIN-NAME_FIELD-NAME

for example, if I want to mask the tax code field of the people table, since the field is mapped via JPA in Person.taxCode, the role will be

ROLE_MASK_PERSON_TAXCODE

The mapping editing is managed dynamically with a special GUI function. We used the existing Domanin Editor function, a generic domain editor that for all domain classes it allows the modification of all the fields mapped to the database.
We have added a new editing form for managing data-masking mapping.
The form will contain all the fields of the chosen domain class. For each field you can choose (with a special checkbox) whether or not to enable the relative masking. When saving, the function performs the following steps:

  • look in the Authorities table if the role ROLE_MASK_DOMAIN-NAME_FIELD-NAME exists. If it does not exist it creates (the opposite if the field must be disabled)

For mapping with profiles (Spring Security Groups) are used the already present Spring Security functions implemented in the appropriate View of the application.

Masking class

Creation of a class that receives as input the data to be masked and its name (for example, Person.taxCode).
The class looks for (with the methods that provide Spring Secutiry) if the current user’s profile is associated with the corresponding field (ROLE_MASK_PERSON_TAXCODE / Person.taxCode). If exists, the class mask the data and returns it to the view.

Change Views

The functions that provide for masking the data are typically those of inquiry. In our case it helps us the fact that we have adopted tags in the presentation layer so all the shows and lists use a display.tagx tag and a table.tagx tag. We need to change these two tags to make them use the masking class.
The longest work concerns modifies all jsps that use the two tags, which must declare the name of the field they are viewing.

Finally we have also modified the search filters to make sure that if the filter provides the search for a field that must be masked, the filter is disabled.
For example, if the filter requires a search for tax code, the filter must use the masking class to know at runtime if the profile expects to mask this data.
If so, the filter is disabled.

Conclusions

View Rewriting with role based security is the best solution for the following reasons:

  • effort slightly greater than the JPA Rewriting solution but more or less similar
  • use of spring security to map the data to be masked to the profile
  • greater custom in terms of look & feel
  • absence of data corruption risk
  • absence of user session out of memory risk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s